- Trent vs Wan-Bissaka is a new debate that Manchester United fans have initiated.
- Crystal Palace defender Van Aanholt picks his former teammate over Trent, saying that Wan-Bissaka is easily better.
- The Palace left-back praises Trent's offensive prowess, but says that the Man United right-back is far superior defensively.
- He adds that someone like Wilfried Zaha would choose playing against Trent everyday rather than going up against Wan-Bissaka.
Speaking on the Counter Attack podcast, the left-back said: "[Wan-Bissaka] better than Alexander-Arnold? Without a shadow of a doubt.
"They are different players. Defensively, Aaron is unbelievable, better than Trent.
"Yes, Trent has got his attacking and his corners, his right foot. But if you ask Wilf [Zaha] who he would want to play against, every other day, Trent or Wan-Bissaka, I think he will say Trent."
Van Aanholt adds: "I have got respect for Trent because he does everything with his assists and he is great, but defensively, just ask [Raheem] Sterling how good Wan-Bissaka is.
"It is a problem, and he will switch. He is one of the best right-backs, I think he could be, his attacking is good, but he needs more goals or assists to his name."
We have a few issues with this opinion - Wan-Bissaka may be defensively better than Trent, but the English international has had one and a half good seasons in the Premier League and has yet to go up against Europe's elite players.
Trent, on the other hand, has been the most creative outlet for a team that has won the Champions League, reached back-to-back finals of the same competition, and who will most likely win the Premier League title this season.
Liverpool's right-back is not far behind Wan-Bissaka defensively, but he is miles ahead of the former Palace player offensively - he has 12 assists and 2 goals this season, as compared to the Man United player's 2 assists and 0 goals.
What do you think of Van Aanholt's opinion? Let us know what you think in the comments or make a post about it on our blogging platform!