Nigeria Football Federation president Amaju Pinnick has sparked quite a controversy when he claimed that Lille striker Victor Osimhen is better than Chelsea's very own Tammy Abraham.
You can't help feeling that one of the main reasons why he said that is Tammy preferring England over Nigeria as the country he's going to represent in the international games. Still, the comparison is legitimate: both the strikers have scored 13 goals in their respective leagues and 2 goals in the Champions League (they even played and scored once against each other).
Recently, Osimhen was even mentioned as a potential Chelsea target, while an unnamed club has made a Β£75 million bid for the 21-year-old.
So, who is better, Tammy or Victor? Our users have spoken out.
π¬ Roger Moore: "I see Osimhen becoming the new Drogba at Stamford Bridge should Chelsea sign him."
Here's Victor scoring:
π¬ Zambian man: "If he can come to England and score 20 goals every season, then you can say he is better than Abraham. But as things stand, Abraham is better than this guy."
π¬ John Dapomola Adeniyi: "Let's be frank here, Victor is better than Tammy, much stronger than Tammy and even his shot is much better than Tammy's. But both of them need to work harder to reach their full potential."
π¬ White Comedy: "Have you all forgotten that Osimhen plays in one of the easiest leagues? Abraham plays in the hardest league."
π¬ HighStar: "I'd choose Victor any day over Tammy. The guy has got some fire in him that makes him a good striker. Tammy is a clinical finisher and good in hold up play but then, Victor looks more complete."
π¬ Colby Helmer: "We donβt need Osimhen guys, we already have Tammy, we need someone like Werner or Martinez, we donβt need another average player up front."
β And who would you prefer out of those two? Share your thoughts in the comments or on our newly-launched blogging platform!
